Saturday, July 18, 2009

HISTRIO-MASTIX

The players scourge, or, actors tragædie, divided into two parts.

William Prynne (1600-1669)

Wherein it is largely evidenced, by divers arguments, by the concurring authorities and resolutions of sundry texts of Scripture, That popular stage-playes are sinfull, heathenish, lewde, ungodly spectacles, and most pernicious corruptions; condemned in all ages, as intolerable mischiefes to churches, to republickes, to the manners, mindes, and soules of men.
And that the profession of play-poets, of stage-players; together with the penning, acting, and frequenting of stage-playes, are unlawfull, infamous and misbeseeming Christians. All pretences to the contrary are here likewise fully answered; and the unlawfulnes of acting, of beholding academicall enterludes, briefly discussed; besides sundry other particulars concerning dancing, dicing, health-drinking, &c. of which the table will informe you.

THE PROLOGUE

Such hath always been, and yet is, the perverse and wretched condition of sinful man, the cogitations of whose heart are evil and only evil before God, and that continually: that it is far more easy to estrange him from his best, and chiefest joys; than to divorce him from his truest misery, the pleasures of sin, which are but for a season, yet set in endless grief. Man always hugs his pleasurable sins so fast, out of a preposterous and misguided love, which makes his reformation desperate, that if any soul-compassionating Christians attempt to wrest them from him, he forthwith takes up arms against them, returning them no other answer, then that of Ruth to Naomi, in a far better case: The Lord doe so to me, and more also, if ought but death part them and me: where they dye, I will dye, and there will I bee buried. And thus alas he lives, nay, dies and lies (as too, too many daily do) entombed both with and in his darling crimes.

How naturally prone men are to cleave to worldly pleasures and delights of sin, in despite of all those powerful attractives which might withdraw them from them; to omit all other particular instances, we may behold a real and lively experiment of it in profane and poisonous STAGE-PLAYS, the common idol and prevailing evil of our dissolute and degenerous Age. Which though they had their rise from hell, yea, their birth, and pedigree from the very Devil himself, to whose honour and service they were at first devoted. Though they have been oft condemned and quite exploded by the whole Primitive Church, both under the Law and Gospel, by the unanimous vote of all the Fathers, and sundry Councils from age to age, by modern divines, and Christian authors of all sorts, by divers heathen states, and emperors, and by whole Grand Juries of profane writers (as well historians and poets as philosophers) as the incendiaries and common nurseries of all villainy and wickedness, the bane and overthrow of all grace and goodness, the very poison and corruption of men's minds and manners, the very fatal plagues and overtures of those states and kingdoms where they are once tolerated, as I shall prove anon.

Yet we, we miserable and graceless wretches, after so many sentences of condemnation passed upon them, after so many judgments already inflicted on and yet threatened to us for them, after so many years and jubilees of the glorious Gospel-sun-shine which teacheth us to deny ungodliness and all worldly lusts and to live soberly, righteously and godly in this present world, looking for the coming, and appearance of the great God and our Savior Jesus Christ. Yea, after our very vow and sacred covenant in Baptism, which binds us to forsake the Devil and all his works, the pomps and vanities of this wicked world and all the sinful lusts of the flesh, of which these Stage-Plays are the chief. As if we were quite degenerated, not only from the grace and holinesses of Christians, but even from the natural goodness and morality of pagans in former ages, do now, even now, in the midst of all our fears at home and the miserable desolations of God's Church abroad (the very thoughts of which should cause our hearts to bleed, and souls to mourn; much more our hellish jollity, and mirth to cease): as if we had made a covenant with hell, and sworn allegiance to the Devil himself, enthrall, and sell ourselves to these diabolical, and hellish interludes, notwithstanding all that God or man have said against them. And would rather part with Christ, religion, God, or heaven, than with them. Yea, so far are many men's affections wedded to these profane and heathenish vanities, that as it was in Saint Augustine's time, even so it is now, whosoever is but displeased and offended with them, is presently reputed for a common enemy.

He that speaks against them or comes not at them, is forthwith branded for a schismatical or factious Puritan. And if any one assay to alter or suppress them, he becomes so odious unto many, that did not the fear of punishment restrain their malice, they would not only scorn and disgrace but even stone or rent him all to pieces, as a man unworthy for to live on earth. Whereas such who further these delights of sin are highly magnified, as the chief contrivers of the public happiness. There was once a time (if Tertullian, with some other ancient Fathers may be credited) when as it was the chiefest badge and character of a Christian, to refrain from Stage-Plays: yea, this was one great crime which the pagans did object against the Christians in the Primitive Church, that they came not to their interludes. But now (as if Stage-Plays were our Creed and Gospel, or the truest emblem of our Christian profession) those are not worthy of the name of Christians - they must be Puritans and Precisians; not Protestants, who dislike them.

Heu quantum mutatus ab illo?

Alas, how far are Christians now degenerated from what they were in ancient times; when as that which was their badge and honour heretofore is now become their brand and shame? Quantus in Christiano populo honor Christi est, vbi religio ignobilem facit? How little doe we Christians honour Christ, when as the ancient character; and practical power, of religion (I mean the abandoning, and renouncing of sin-fomenting Stage-Plays) subject men unto the highest censure, and disgrace?

Conquerar? an taceam?

This being the dissolute and unhappy constitution of our depraved times, it put me at the first to this dilemma, whether to sit mute and silent still and mourn in secret for these overspreading abominations (which have got such head of late among us, that many who visit the Church scarce once a week, frequent the Playhouse once a day). Or whether I should lift up my voice like a trumpet and cry against them to my power? If I should bend my tongue or pen against them (as I have done against some other sinful and unchristian vanities), my thoughts informed me that I might with the unfortunate Disciples, fish all night, and catch just nothing at the last but the reproach and scorn of the histrionicall and profaner sort, whose tongues are set on fire of hell against all such as dare affront their hellish practices. And so my hopes and travail would bee wrecked at once. If I should on the other side, neglect to doe my uttermost to extirpate or withstand these dangerous spectacles, or to withdraw such persons from them as my pains and brief collections in this subject might reclaim, when God had put this opportunity into my hand and will into my heart to do it, my conscience then persuaded me, that my negligence and slackness in this kind might make me guilty of the death of all such ignorant, and seduced souls, which these my poor endeavors might rescue from these chains of hell, and cords of sin, and interest me in all the evil which they might suppress.

Whereupon I resolved with myself at last, to endure the cross and despise the hate and shame, which the publishing of this HISTRIO-MASTIX might procure me, and to assuage (at least in my endeavors, if not otherwise,) these inveterate, and festered ulcers (which may endanger Church, and State at once) by applying some speedy corrosives and emplaisters to them, and ripping up their noxious and infectious nature, on the public theater in these ensuingActs and Scenes. Which I thought good to style, The Players' or Actors' Tragedy - not so much for the style or method of it (for alas, here is neither tragic style, nor poetical strains, nor rare invention, nor clown, nor actor in it, but only bare, and naked truth which needs no Eloquence nor strain of wit for to adorn or plead its cause) - as for the good effects I hope it may and will produce, to the suppression and extirpation, at least the restraint and diminution` both of plays, and common actors, and all those several mischievous and pestiferous fruits of hellish wickednesses that issue from them. Which much desired success, and reformation, if I could but live to see; I should deem myself an happy man, and think my labour richly recompensed.


[Spelling and punctuation modernized]

Ruth 1: 17 - Where thou diest, will I die, and there will I be buried: the Lord do so to me, and more also, if ought but death part thee and me.

attractives = attractions

degenerous = degenerate

Isaiah 28:15 - "Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with hell are we at agreement".

schismatical = The most extreme English puritans separated themselves from the English Church, refusing to attend its worship; they were accused of the sin of schism - a deliberate and unwarranted break with the church.

Precisians = Puritans were regarded as being to rigidly precise in their insistence on proper religious forms and so were detractingly called precisians, e.g. Drayton (1612) "Like our Precisians. Who for some cross or saint they in the window see will pluck down all the church."

Heu "quantum mutatus ab illo [Hectore]" = Vergil, Aeneid, II 274-275 Alas "how changed from that earlier Hector"

"Conquerar, an taceam?" = "Complaint or silence?" Ovid, Ex ponto, IV.iii (To a faithless friend).

histrionicall = histrionic, i.e. theatrical, dramatic.

John 21,1-4.

emplaisters = plasters, a substance spread on a wound to close it.

Monday, July 13, 2009

IMPRO BOOKS

The following was retrieved from http://appliedimprov.ning.com/notes/Impro_books_in_English

Books in English

More reading (articles)

Books in Foreign languages

Activities from Improvisation Theater to develop creativity, leadership, teambuilding, communication skills,...in organisations

58 1/2 Ways to Improvise in Training: Improvisation Games and Activities for Workshops, Courses and Team Meetings, Paul Z. Jackson
A trainer’s step-by-step guide to amazing activities which teach communication skills, leadership and creativity. Good selection of clearly-explained simple-to-run games, organized by number of participants, visual/verbal/physical matrix, degree of energy and time taken to run.

The inspirational trainer: Make Training Time Flexible, Responsive, Paul Z Jackson,Creative Kogan Page, 0-7494-3468-6
A wide-ranging handbook for trainers who aspire to inspire. Practical and provocative, tips and ideas, drawing on AL, drama, sports and psychology- wih particular reference to improvisation. Introduces concept of Rehearsals for Success, combining elements of role play, forum theatre and coaching..
(previously published in hardback as Impro Learning, Gower)

Theater Games for the Classroom: A Teacher's Handbook
Viola Spolin, Northwestern University Press
Exactly what the title says. A better organised book, with helpful bibliography and appendices.

Training to Imagine: Practical Improvisational Theatre Techniques to Enhance Creativity, Teamwork, Leadership and Learning, Kat Koppett

Working with groups to enhance Relationships : 46 interactive exercices to build communication, encourage cooperation and rekindle companionship, Marie-Nathalie Beaudoin and Sue Walden

Improvisation applied to business or to life

Competing on the Edge : Strategy as Structured Chaos, Shona L. Brown,and Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, Harvard Business School Press 1998

Everything's An Offer: How to do more with less Robert Poynton and Gary Hirsch 2008

Experiencing risk, spontaneity and improvisation in organizational change: working live. Shaw Patricia, Edited with Stacey, R.D. Routledge 2006,.

Free Play: Improvisation in Life and Art, Steven Nachmanovitch

GameChangers -- Improvisation for Business in the Networked World,Mike Bonifer

Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration, Keith Sawyer,

Improv Yourself: Business Spontaneity at the Speed of Thought by Joseph A. Keefe and Joe Keefe

Improv wisdom: Don't Prepare, Just Show Up, Patricia Ryan Madson, Bell Tower 2005

Improvisation, Inc.: Harnessing Spontaneity to Engage People and Groups ,Robert Lowe

Improvise This! How to Think on Your Feet So You Don't Fall on Your Face Mark Bergren, et al

Organizational Improvisation by: Kamoche, Ken; Cunha, Miguel Pina E.; Cunha, Joao Vieira Da

Presentation Zen: Simple Ideas on Presentation Design and Delivery (Voices That Matter) Garr Reynolds, New Riders 2008

The Flexible Thinker: A Guide to Creative Wealth by Michael Rosenburg (Author), Helen Bauer (Illustrator), Michael D. Rosenberg (Author)

Transcultural Experiments by: Berry, Ellen E.

When I Say This... ...Do You Mean That?:,: Enhancing on the Job Communication Skills Using the Rules and the Tools of the Improv Comedy Player, Cherie Kerr, Julia Sweeney 1998

Improvisation Theater in general

Acting on Impulse: The Art of Making Improv Theater, Carol Hazenfield

Action Theater: The Improvisation of Presence, Ruth Zaporah, North Atlantic Books, California 1995
A 20-day course of exercises, with instructions and discussion. Plenty of intensive activities, mostly theatre, some dance. Good understanding of the heart of impro - expressed in whimsical lines.

Book on Acting: Improvisation Technique for the Professional Actor in Film, Theater, and Television , Stephen Book

Games for Actors and Non-Actors, Augusto Boal, Routledge London 1992
Political improvisation from the founder of Theatre of the Oppressed. Lots of great games, also plenty of concepts and jargon.

Group Improvisation: The Manual of Ensemble Improv Games, Peter Gwinn

Impro: Improvisation and the Theatre, Keith Johnstone, Methuen, 1979,
Still the best introduction to impro for the theatre. Very readable, funny and illuminating. A major inspiration for staged impro in UK, USA, Canada and Australia.

Improv! A handbook for the actor. Atkins, G. 1994. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann

Improvisation: Use What You Know, Make Up What You Don't (2nd Edition) (Paperback), by Brad Newton

Improvisation for Actors and Writers: A Guidebook for Improv Lessons in Comedy Bill Lynn, Kip King

Improvisation for the Theater 3E: A Handbook of Teaching and Directing Techniques, Viola Spolin, Northwestern University Press
Johnstone’s main ‘rival’ as originator of theatre games as performance. Lots of exercises, thorough explanations, and useful ideas about things like side-coaching.

Playing Boal: Theatre, Therapy, Activism, Mady Schutzman and Jan Cohen-Cruz, Routledge London 1994
Mixed bag of essays from Boal practitioners and watchers. Impro for politics and for therapy, links back to Moreno.

The Improv Handbook: The Ultimate Guide to Improvising in Comedy, Theatre, and Beyond Tom Salinsky, Deborah Frances-White

Theater Games for the Lone Actor Viola Spolin, A Handbook, 2001

The Playbook: Improv Games for Performers, William Hall www.improvplaybook.com

Truth in Comedy :The Manual of Improvisation Charna Halpern,and Del Close 1952

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Acting Theory

I freely confess that I think acting is an essential aspect of being human. This idea formed in me first because I have found great pleasure in doing theatre since I was a young boy. Given, however, the profound place that Christian faith has in my life, theology further provoked this idea that acting defines humanity.

There is much that has been written about theology and about theatre. I have read and will continue to read these writings of others, although I will not let myself be limited by those writings. It is rare that they discuss my idea as I conceive it. As I wrote in another post (Monday, June 30, 2008), there have been four books in particular that do come close and I have since discovered others that do as well.

What I want to write is about theology/theatre - theatre in service of theology and theology implicit in theatre. Let all the world be a stage and all of us be players, always acting before an audience of One. That One will review our play on the Last Day, which means that every moment until then is laden with great theological/theatrical import.

Sunday, July 13, 2008

SOMEONE TOUCHED ME

MAKING CONTACT WITH ONE ANOTHER IN CHRIST



And all who touched him
were healed.
Matthew 14:36



Touching begins something.
When one touches another,
some connection is made in that contact
that creates a relation between
the one and the other.
A power goes out from us to others
in the common yet precious miracle of touch.
To touch another person is a priviledge
that carries with it certain responsibility.
Initiating contact creates an expectation
on the part of the one touched:
What next?
Who touched me?


Part of one stays with the one touched,
part of one is passed on to the one who touches.
Strangers keep their distance from one another
for closeness begets intimacy.
Once begotten, this new relationship
demands continued attention.
Attending to one another
is the responsibility that comes of touching.
It is involuntary.
One may choose not to give on'e further attention,
but that choice is made of one's own volition.

The priviledge of being a stranger
is that one may ignore other strangers.
But, strangeness is fleeting -
we cannot remain strangers for long
in the presence of others.
We may play at being strangers
and, for pretense sake,
ask evasive questions:
What is an acceptable distance
for strangers to keep?
What does one do
if that distance is breached?
How may one move away
without giving offense?
It seems humans must
reach toward one another
or move away.
We cannot really keep our distance.

Impersonal touch is a myth.
All touch is personal.
The impersonal is
a conscious rejection of another person,
and all rejection
implies a personal choice.
One decides to accept the chance for relationship
or deny it.
Continual rejection of others
denies much more than those others
- it denies oneself.

We become ourselves
only in relation to others.
Touching and being touched,
we consummate our relationship to others
in the fellowship of creation.
Reaching out to or accepting
another person created in the image of God,
we begin to sense some contact with
the Person who created us.
Without others
to touch and to touch us,
we become desensitized,
unable to give or receive
those signals of humanity
that communicate personhood.
This desensitization
is the root of bitterness,
apathy,
cynicism,
tyranny,
treachery,
blasphemy,
and sacrilege.
The touching moment,
just as it is followed by
a decision for or against continuance,
is preceded by the intention
to touch or not to touch.
One may or may not be aware
of the particular tendency
that moves or inhibits a touch.
However,
if that tendency is informed by a mind
that actively considers
what is good and acceptable,
then one may be confident
in initiating contact with others.
There is, of course, risk involved in touching,
for the one who is touched
may refuse further contact.
It is hard when one's touch is ill-received.
the risk is well-taken, however,
if one is already in contact
with some other or others
who, one is confident, will remain in touch.
This is essentially the Gospel message:
God reached out by His Word
and touched us first in the beginning
by creating and breathing life into humanity;
yet,
rejection was our response.
The truth is,
all of us have rejected God's friendship
and are in need of reconciliation.
Through Jesus Christ,
God's only begotten Son,
we finally know and are able to
respond rightly to that gracious touch of God.
Jesus, filled with the touched of God's Spirit,
reaches out to to us and calls us
to be his friends,
revealing that
enmity with God was our choice,
not God's.
Confident then in this renewed friendship,
we may reach out and touch others
who are yet enemies of God,
thought they still may think themselves
to be merely strangers.
God knows us though we may ignore Him.
He already established relationship
between Himself and us
in that it was He who created us.
In Him we live and move and have our being.
We live in breach of that relationship
unless we touch the one point of contact
whereby we may be reconciled:
the Lord Jesus Christ.
He it was that came to live among us.
"That which was
from the beginning,
which
we have heard,
which
we have seen with our eyes,
which
we have looked upon,
and
our hands have handled,
concerning the Word of Life;
that which
we have seen and heard
we declare to you,
that
you also may have fellowship with us;
and
truly our fellowship
is with the Father
and
with His Son,
Jesus Christ."
Thus are we assured in Scripture
concerning our hope of reconciliation.
We need not fear touching others
for we know
God is faithful to keep in touch with us.
Touching others and being touched,
we sense,
if only for a fleeting moment,
the very touch of God.

THEATRETHICS

ENSEMBLE ACTING
BEFORE AN AUDIENCE OF ONE

The idea of theatre
is to put on a performance
produced before an audience.
.
The idea of ethics
is to conduct oneself in accordance
with the context of a greater community.
.
The idea of theatrethics
is to act with others
in full consideration of one God
who sees us,
comes before us,
and remains beyond us,
while being with us.
.
Created in God's image,
we have been called
to become imitators of God.
To imitate God is to act like God,
to be godly in our relationships with others.
All human action
takes place in the context of some relationship
and every human act
is held to the standard
of loving others as one loves oneself.
Prior to loving others, of course,
is the imperative that one loves God wholly.
Love never happens in isolation;
in fact, isolation is a rejection of love.
Even the One God
is a Trinity of Persons
in perfect relationship with one another.
Thus is the imitation of God
a matter of acting in careful consideration
of one's relationship with others.
.
What is God like?
God is revealed
through
face-to-face interaction,
faithful following,
and
textual reading.
.
Meeting God face-to-face is impossible
unless God allows such a meeting;
otherwise we follow Jacob's example
and see in our meeting with others
a reflection of God's presence,
seeing in the face of the other
"the face of God."

Sunday, July 6, 2008

WHAT A SHAME:

A CLOWN or JUST A FOOL?
.
I have never mastered the clown's art
of turning my own misfortune
into comedy.
Perhaps laughter is the best defense
against the pain of shame.
The clown makes a trade.
Dressed in his traditional costume,
he behaves with all the foolishness
of a small child
pretending to be an adult.
Although people are laughing at him
(which is embarassing)
the laughter is under his control,
which makes him feel
powerful and proud
of himself
rather than helpless
and ashamed.
.
Most of us work hard to present ourselves to the world as competent and "cool." Any time people laugh at us, our self-esteem is reduced and we are embarassed. Any moment of embarassment is guarenteed to interrupt the flow of our day and reduce our ability to live comfortably among others, let alone feel comforable within ourselves.
.
The clown
gives up this very important piece of self-esteem
in order to gain
whatever sense of personal pride
that comes from his success
in getting us to laugh
at his command.
.
Often one finds amusing something involving somebody's embarrassment.
Examples may range
from pratfalls
or clear, obvious flashes of unexpected stupidity
to subtle comments or allusions
that make one think
of something stupid one has done once oneself
but
that one didn't know
anyone else had ever experienced.
.
Shame always seems to involve a more-or-less sudden decrease in self-esteem, a moment in which we are revealed as somewhat less than one wants to believe. In a situation where people are friendly to one another, such exposure is in an atmosphere of interpersonal safety. When one's frailties or foibles are exposed before those in whose presence one does not feel safe or loved, this mild, humorous embarrassment gives way to the deeper forms of shame like humiliation or mortification.
.
Comedy, however, rarely does more than hint at the darker side of shame; perhaps some of its success lies in the delicacy of its success lies in the delicacy with which it plays around the edges of what is hidden within each of us. We all live on some line between shame and pride. The word of comedy is to make this border a bit safer.
.
The comedian stands alongside us, pointing at others, exposing the falseness of their self-esteem and so allowing us the safety of laughing at them, while the clown focuses our attention on himself and asks us to laugh at him. The only remaining performers who make us laugh are the jesters, who (to the extent they are given permission) can expose our secrets and make us laugh at ourselves. They live at the greatest risk, for the slightest slip will move them past the boundary of "good taste" into a realm where they incur only wrath. In the medieval court, the jest alone could tell the truth about the king. Usually deformed and therefore already "defective" and shame-worthy creature, his humor came from this ability to expose and embarrass within strictly defined limits. There are a lot of jokes about jesters sentenced to death for "going too far."
.
Shame can power all forms of humor.
There is, of course,
more to humor than shame,
and
more to happiness
than liberation from shame.
Nevertheless,
few experiences in life are so pleasant
as the moment of release from shame
or
the realization that
our foibles
are accepted
with love.
.
Adapted from Donald L. Nathanson's
SHAME & PRIDE: AFFECT, SEX, & THE BIRTH OF THE SELF
(pp 16-17)

FOOL OF WISDOM

MOROSOPHIA
(foolosophy: foolish wisdom of God)

This fellow's wise enough
to play the fool.
TWELFTH NIGHT, IIIi:61
I turned my mind to understand,
to investigate,
to search out
wisdom
and the scheme of things.
I turned my mind to understand
the stupidity of wickedness and
the madness of folly.

Applying myself to the understanding of wisdom
as well as of madness and folly,
I learned that
this is a chasing after the wind.
My mind still guiding me with "wisdom,"
I tried cheering myself with wine,
and embracing folly.
Loose laughter, however, is foolish.
What does such pleasure accomplish?

wisdom.
OUTWEIGHS
A little folly
Was ever one wiser than one's own weak wit?
Why would one ever dare to think, "Try it?"

When one's world is found empty,
God's word proves itself full.

Was one ever so wise to not fail as a fool?

There is more hope for a fool
than one wise in one's own eyes.
A proverb in the mouth of a fool
hangs limp.
Answer not a fool according to his folly
lest you become
like a fool yourself.
Answer a fool according to his folly
lest, in his own eyes,
he become wise.
Wisdom reposes in the heart of the discerning
and
even among fools
she lets herself be known.
Folly is loud
undisciplined
without knowledge.
Sitting at the highest point in the city,
Folly calls out to those who pass by:
"Let all who are simple come here! "
To all who lack judgment,
Folly says,
"Stolen water is sweet;
food eaten in secret is delicious!"
But little do they know
that the dead are there;
the guests of Folly
are in the depths of the grave.
The wise in heart accept commands,
but a chattering fool
comes to ruin.
The wise store up knowledge,
but the mouth of a fool
invites ruin.
Whoever conceals one's hatred
has lying lips,
and whoever spreads slander
is a fool.
The lips of the righteous nourish many,
but fools die for lack of judgment.
The one who brings trouble on one's family
will inherit the wind,
and the fool will be servant to the wise.
The way of a fool
seems right to him,
but a wise man listens to advice.
A fool shows his annoyance at once,
but a prudent man overlooks an insult.
A prudent man keeps his knowledge to himself,
but the hearts of fools blurt out folly.
Every prudent man acts out of knowledge,
but a fool exposes his folly.
A longing fulfilled is sweet to the soul,
but fools detest turning from evil.
He who walks with the wise grows wise,
but a companion of fools suffers harm.
The wise woman builds her house,
but with her own hands
the foolish one tears her house down.
A fool's talk brings a rod to his back,
but the lips of the wise protect them.
Stay away from a foolish man,
for you will not find knowledge
on his lips.
The wisdom of the prudent
is to give thought to their ways,
but the folly of fools is deception.
Fools mock at making amends for sin,
but good will is found among the upright.
Even in laughter the heart may ache
and joy may end in grief.
A wise man fears the LORD and shuns evil,
but a fool is hotheaded and reckless.
The simple inherit folly,
but the prudent are crowned with knowledge.
The wealth of the wise is their crown,
but
the folly of fools yields folly.
A patient man has great understanding,
but a quick-tempered man displays folly.
A fool spurns his father's discipline,
but whoever heeds correction shows prudence.
The lips of the wise spread knowledge;
not so the hearts of fools.
Death and Destruction lie open to the LORD
- how much more the hearts of men!
The discerning heart seeks knowledge,
but the mouth of a fool feeds on folly.
Folly delights one who lacks judgment,
but a man of understanding keeps a straight course.
Understanding is a fountain of life
to those who have it,
but folly brings punishment to fools.
For a fool
HONOR
is unfitting.
A longing fulfilled
is sweet to the soul,
yet the fool is determined
to return to his folly.